British Medical Journal has a Youtube channel that is very interesting. (via the ScienceRoll Blog)
In a search I did not see anything on pharmacy or therapeutics. Anyone?
British Medical Journal has a Youtube channel that is very interesting. (via the ScienceRoll Blog)
In a search I did not see anything on pharmacy or therapeutics. Anyone?
This is from a recent ASHP newsletter. I find this to be freaking awesome. Hope to comment on the ones that have informatic implications for even better improvements and ROI.
An evaluation of studies published from 2001 through 2005 found a median savings of $4.81 for every dollar spent on clinical pharmacy services. The savings ranged from $1 to $34.60 per dollar spent.
http://www.pharmacotherapy.org/pdf/free/Pharm2811_Perez-EconEval.pdf
The envelope please..... Based on a completely unscientific, unsubstantiated, nonbinding, and otherwise meaningless poll of a small number of geeks willing to vote on such things --- the winners of the Top Pharmacoinformatic articles of 2008 are (drum roll please):
Workarounds to Barcode Medication Administration Systems: Their Occurrences, Causes, and Threats to Patient Safety doi:10.1197/jamia.M2616
Effectiveness of a Barcode Medication Administration System in Reducing Preventable Adverse Drug Events in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.08.025
Severity of medication administration errors detected by a bar-code medication administration system American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 65, Issue 17, 1661-1666
The (Slowly) Vanishing Prescription Pad NEJM Volume 359:115-117 July 10, 2008 Number 2
Saving Lives, Saving Money: The Imperative for Computerized Physician Order Entry in Massachusetts Hospitals: Released Feb. 14, 2008 http://www.masstech.org/ehealth/cpoe/cpoe08release.html
Opportunities for Enhancing the FDA Guidance on Pharmacovigilance JAMA. 2008;300(8):952-954 (doi:10.1001/jama.300.8.952)
Drug target identification using side-effect similarity. Science 11 July 2008 http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/321/5886/263
UCSF Program Achieves over 56% Reduction in Medication Administration Error http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2008_March_26/ai_n24959258/print?tag=artBody;col1
Improving antibiotic prescribing for adults with community acquired pneumonia: Does a computerised decision support system achieve more than academic detailing alone? http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/8/35
Pharmacy Informatics Syllabi in Doctor of Pharmacy Programs in the US http://www.ajpe.org/view.asp?art=aj720489&pdf=yes
Comments, critiques, kudos, criticisms or cynicisms are welcome and encouraged!
Wow have a few days off? Check these out.
From The Scienceroll.com - a terrific blog, fyi. This post lists the best of Medicine 2.0http://scienceroll.com/2008/12/22/web-20-in-medicine-services-of-2008/
Dean Giustini at UBC Academic Search - Google Scholar Blog created an incredibly useful list of the best web 2.0-based medical services of 2008.This study in JAMA documents that 1 in 25 elderly Americans take a potentially harmful combination of medications. Is this and indictment on the lousy job pharmacists are doing picking up on these combos and how bad the DDI checking software is?
Use of Prescription and Over-the-counter Medications and Dietary Supplements Among Older Adults in the United States
JAMA. 2008; 300:2867-2878. ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT | PDF
At the BCMA networking session at the ASHP meeting, the floor was opened up for questions. So of course, I needed to ask “the ROI question” to the panel that was assembled.
So here is my recollection of my question: Given the current financial situation and the fact that there are no good studies to show the value of BCMA, how do you justify the practice?
The responses where to the effect:
The near miss statistic was uncovered as bogus, in a later story of how nurses have all of the insulin stickers on the back of their badges and scan until they get a correct scan. Where, presumably each scan is logged as a near miss.
I could not help think of what my old room mate taught me with example after example of selling cars. People buy with emotion and justify with logic. I clearly heard lots of emotion from the panel. They where making emotional arguments and justifying the practice with logic, devoid of any science.
Excuse me, but isn’t pharmacy a scientific profession. Shouldn’t we have a scientific explanation for BCMA as a practice.
The science behind unit dose distribution was marvelous. Yet, we continue to make emotional pleas for BCMA.
This will not hold up over time, we need more science or we are toast.
Anyone on Twitter? It is very cool. Well, let me just say I am still attempting to find the ‘sweat spot’ for the use of this technology. This PPT helps.
My twitter name is “poikonen” if anyone dives in.
This is via the blog http://healthinformaticsblog.com/